Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorParsons, Mikeal Carl, 1957-
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, Kathy Reiko.
dc.contributor.otherBaylor University. Dept. of Religion.en
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-15T17:54:22Z
dc.date.available2008-04-15T17:54:22Z
dc.date.copyright2007
dc.date.issued2008-04-15T17:54:22Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/5142
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 322-351).en
dc.description.abstractThe audience, and its varying levels of participation, is a vital element for the communication of a story. The stories of Jesus Christ as told in the gospels, and of the early Church as found in Acts, rely on the audience members and their participation as do all others. In fact, without audience participation, the narrative fails. Audience-oriented criticism, while named only recently, is an ancient phenomenon as old as story telling itself. This dissertation explores ancient rhetoricians' comments about the audience, as well as the kinds of audience participation expected and the tools used to encourage such participation. In the course of this project, it becomes clear that these tools were used in ancient pagan, Jewish, and Christian literature. Ancient rhetors and authors were quite concerned with engaging the audience—an engaged audience at the very least paid attention and in many cases helped the author create the story, making the audience more inclined toward moral formation. Modern rhetoricians, such as Meir Sternberg and Wolfgang Iser, deal with this phenomenon under the category of literary gap theory. Long before the modern novel and post-Enlightenment story-telling strategies, however, ancient speakers and writers left holes or gaps in their narratives, encouraging the audience to become "fellow-workers" (Mor. 48:14) with the speaker. Identifying ancient roots for such modern theories helps guard against anachronistic methodological missteps, while simultaneously preventing the same theories from being dismissed out of hand. The conclusions reached by this project impact not only the way biblical scholars view the rhetorical abilities of the Evangelists, but also the way in which modern readers "hear" the biblical narrative. The responsibility of audience participation did not end with the ancient audience. The modern audience also bears the responsibility of hearing between the lines, of creating the story with the ancient author. In our particular context as the people of God reading the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures, we are all the more likely to be persuaded by the argument we help complete, astonished by the pictures we help draw, and formed by the story we help create.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Kathy Reiko Maxwell.en
dc.format.extentviii, 351 p. : ill.en
dc.format.extent156653 bytes
dc.format.extent1857936 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rightsBaylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact librarywebmaster@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.en
dc.subjectBible. N.T. Luke -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.en
dc.subjectBible. N.T. Acts -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.en
dc.subjectBible -- Reader-response criticism.en
dc.subjectRhetoric in the Bible.en
dc.subjectRhetoric, Ancient.en
dc.subjectBible as literature.en
dc.titleHearing between the lines: the audience as fellow-worker in Luke-Acts and its literary milieu.en
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.degreePh.D.en
dc.rights.accessrightsWorldwide accessen
dc.contributor.departmentReligion.en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record