Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDonnelly, Phillip J. (Phillip Johnathan), 1969-
dc.contributor.authorGetz, Evan Jay.
dc.contributor.otherBaylor University. Dept. of English.en
dc.date.accessioned2008-10-14T18:44:51Z
dc.date.available2008-10-14T18:44:51Z
dc.date.copyright2008-08
dc.date.issued2008-10-14T18:44:51Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/5231
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 147-152)en
dc.description.abstractLucy Hutchinson's translation of the ancient epic De Rerum Natura is remarkable in light of her firm commitments to Calvinist theology and the doctrine of Providence. David Norbrook and Jonathan Goldberg offer strikingly different explanations for the translation exercise. For instance, Norbrook argues that Hutchinson translates Lucretius in order that she might learn from the false images in Lucretius and make better ones in such works as Order and Disorder (Norbrook, “Margaret” 191). In contrast, Goldberg argues for compatibility between Lucretian atomism and Hutchinson’s Christianity, seeing no contradiction or tension (Goldberg 286). I argue that neither critic accounts for the aesthetics of beauty in Hutchinson's poetry; both critics instead attribute an aesthetics of the sublime to Hutchinson. In making this argument, I show that Hutchinson's theory of causation has much in common with Reformed Scholasticism, whereby she is able to restore a metaphysics of formal and final cause. Hutchinson also revives the doctrine of the analogy of being, or analogia entis, in order to show that the formal cause of creation is visible as God's glory. After a discussion of her metaphysics and ontology, I then show that Hutchinson's poetry reflects a theological aesthetics of beauty and not the aesthetics of the sublime. In the fourth chapter, I compare the typological accounts of Abraham found in Thomas Hobbes' Leviathan and Hutchinson's Order and Disorder with a view to virtue as the proper basis of authority. I conclude that the virtues of Hutchinson's Abraham invite individual participation in a way which is prevented by Hobbes. In my final chapter, I show that Hutchinson writes a hagiographical account of her husband in the Memoirs of Colonel Hutchinson.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Evan Jay Getz.en
dc.format.extentiv, 152 p.en
dc.format.extent159071 bytes
dc.format.extent715150 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rightsBaylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact librarywebmaster@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.en
dc.subjectHutchinson, Lucy, b. 1620 -- Criticism and interpretation.en
dc.subjectMetaphysics in literature.en
dc.subjectCausation in literature.en
dc.subjectAnalogy (Religion).en
dc.subjectAesthetics -- Religious aspects.en
dc.subjectProvidence and government of God in literature.en
dc.titleAnalogy, causation, and beauty in the works of Lucy Hutchinson.en
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.degreePh.D.en
dc.rights.accessrightsBaylor University access onlyen
dc.contributor.departmentEnglish.en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record