Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHarvey, Barry, 1954-
dc.contributor.authorCary, Jeffrey W. (Jeffrey Wayne), 1973-
dc.contributor.otherBaylor University. Dept. of Religion.en
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-08T16:14:43Z
dc.date.available2010-10-08T16:14:43Z
dc.date.copyright2010-08
dc.date.issued2010-10-08T16:14:43Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/8022
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. ).en
dc.description.abstractThose within the free church tradition have often appealed to the notion of the invisible church to account for the unity of Christ's Body. A growing number of free church theologians, however, are arguing for the necessity of visible ecclesial unity, which immediately raises the perennial problem of the authorities by which unity is maintained. There is also a growing recognition among free church theologians of the need to recognize the authority of tradition alongside the authority of Scripture. Chapter two charts and affirms these recent developments but then inquires whether a turn toward visible unity together with an embrace of the authority of tradition can eventually be coherent without also embracing the authority of an extra-congregational teaching office. Chapters three and four engage two theologians from outside the free church tradition. Robert Jenson and Rowan Williams both argue that authority is located in the classic loci of Scripture, tradition and an episcopal teaching office. These chapters will observe what vision of visible ecclesial unity emerges from the ways in which each of these theologians construes the relationships among these three loci. While there are significant differences between their visions of visible unity, together they present serious challenges to those within the free church tradition concerning authority, unity and truthfulness. Chapter five will engage free church theologian James McClendon, a pioneer of these newer free church developments. While McClendon has made invaluable contributions within the free church tradition, this chapter will argue that McClendon's account of ecclesial unity and his defense of a free church polity arise out of certain theological deficiencies which can be supplemented by the work of Jenson and Williams. The conclusion will argue that more recent free church theologians have advanced beyond McClendon, especially in his areas of deficiency. Yet it is precisely these advances that make a free church polity even more problematic, especially as a long term project. This study concludes that a move toward visible unity along with a retrieval of the authority of tradition leads naturally toward the usefulness of, if not the need for, some form of global teaching office.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jeffrey W. Cary.en
dc.format.extent86953 bytes
dc.format.extent1343912 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rightsBaylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact librarywebmaster@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.en
dc.subjectFree church ecclesiology.en
dc.subjectRobert Jenson.en
dc.subjectRowan Williams.en
dc.subjectJames McClendon.en
dc.subjectAuthority.en
dc.subjectEcclesiology.en
dc.subjectChurch unity.en
dc.subjectBody of christ.en
dc.subjectVisible unity.en
dc.titleAuthority, unity and truthfulness : the body of christ in the theologies of Robert Jenson and Rowan Williams with a view toward implications for free church ecclesiology.en
dc.typeThesisen
dc.description.degreePh.D.en
dc.rights.accessrightsWorldwide accessen
dc.contributor.departmentReligion.en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record