Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaurer, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-13T15:26:50Z
dc.date.available2011-05-13T15:26:50Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-13T15:26:50Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/8183
dc.description.abstractIt’s clear that traditional forms of academic publication are rapidly becoming obsolete. It’s also clear that peer review is a seriously flawed process that could be much improved upon by modern methods of communication. The primary flaw in the peer review process is that it gathers the opinions of a small group (two-to-four) of individuals, and attempts to make a decision based on that sample. It is my contention, that, except in rare cases, this decision is based on too small a sample to be valid. In this opinion piece, I suggest a method for gathering reviews from a wider group of people with the aim of improving the decision-making process.en
dc.format.extent39486 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectPeer Reviewen
dc.subjectAlternative Review Strategiesen
dc.titleReview-by-Few or Review-by-Many?en
dc.licenseGPLen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record