Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorNichols, David K.
dc.contributor.authorBartl, Anthony D.
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-29T16:14:15Z
dc.date.available2012-11-29T16:14:15Z
dc.date.copyright2012-08
dc.date.issued2012-11-29
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/8504
dc.description.abstractJustice Kennedy is the nation's most influential jurist, but he is given little respect as a constitutional and legal thinker. Often called the "swing justice" for his pivotal position between the Supreme Court's "liberal" and "conservative" blocs, his frequent control of the Court's most controversial cases is often resented and criticized for an apparent lack of a consistent basis in constitutional principle or jurisprudential method. This dissertation joins the work of those who have previously sought to defend Kennedy from the charge that his jurisprudence lacks integrity. It differs from those previous works, however, by acknowledging a diversity to Kennedy's arguments that prevents his approach from being captured by a single ideological or methodological commitment. Whereas Kennedy's previous defenders have sought to uncover a particular method or an overarching idea that guides his jurisprudence, I argue the Kennedy finds different principles at work in the Constitution and sees his role as a judge to give full voice to these principles as demanded by the context of particular cases. To show how Kennedy's thought reflects upon these principles, I examine his opinions in certain critical and controversial areas of constitutional law--establishment and free exercise, speech and press, and due process liberty. Moving through Kennedy's opinions, a clear commitment emerges to liberty and equality as preeminent constitutional principles that often work together but sometimes find themselves in tension. In Kennedy's understanding, a proper resolution of cases where these principles conflict requires careful exploration of the meaning of these principles and the prudent use of judgment to find "correct balance in constitutional interpretation."en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisheren
dc.rightsBaylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact librarywebmaster@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.subjectSupreme Court.en_US
dc.subjectKennedy, Anthony.en_US
dc.subjectJudicial studies.en_US
dc.subjectConstitutional law.en_US
dc.titleThe principled constitutionalism of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsWorldwide access.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsAccess changed 1/14/14.
dc.contributor.departmentPolitical Science.en_US
dc.contributor.schoolsBaylor University. Dept. of Political Science.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record