The role of zooplankton - phytoplankton community interactions in the nutrient dynamics of Lake Chapala, Mexico.

View/ Open
Access rights
Worldwide access.Date
1988Author
Trotter, Bruce G.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
I investigated ammonia nitrogen (NH^-N)
regeneration and grazing by zooplankton and their
effects on phytoplankton production and biomass. Two
sets of experiments were conducted on samples from Lake
Chapala, Mexico from September through December, 1983.
One set of experiments was designed to measure zooplankton NH^-N regeneration, and the other set was
designed to measure the effects of zooplankton on phytoplankton production, biomass, and production efficiency
(P/B).
Lake Chapala is a large, shallow, tropical lake
with a wet season from late May to September, and a dry
season the remainder of the year. I sampled four
stations, representing major lake regions, five times
each to provide water and organisms for 20 experimental
series. Samples were returned to the laboratory for
enclosure experiments incubated in a large heated
outdoor tank for 3 to 5 days. Polyethylene enclosures
retained and/or excluded zooplankton.
Six species of cladocerans were found in samples
from Lake Chapala, with Ceriodaphnia pulchella as the
most abundant. Only two species of copepods occurred,
but they were more abundant than the cladocerans. The
most frequently encountered species was Diaptomus
albuquerquensis at an average density of 31.48 per
liter.
Zooplankton NH^-N regeneration accounted for
14.5% of ambient NH^-N concentration, for an average
turnover time of 7.8 days. Regeneration provided an
average of 33.0% of NH^-N uptake by phytoplankton
and 93.4% of the estimated nitrogen required for
phytoplankton production.
Zooplankton NH^-N regeneration significantly
contributed to the NH^-N pool but did not supply
enough nitrogen to maintain phytoplankton production at
all times during the study. Zooplankton NH^-N
regeneration was greatest in September when ambient
nitrogen concentrations were highest.
The effect of zooplankton on phytoplankton
production, biomass, and P/B ratio was less clear than
the effect of zooplankton in NH^-N regeneration.
Few significant differences in phytoplankton production
and biomass occurred between experimental and control
enclosures. The effect of zooplankton on phytoplankton
production and biomass seemed to change seasonally, as
NH^-N concentrations declined.
The presence of zooplankton improved phytoplankton
production efficiency (P/B) in the middle part of the
study. The relative change in phytoplankton P/B ratio
between experimental and control enclosures increased
from September to mid-October and declined thereafter.