Rhetorical practice in Congress : a new way to understand institutional decline.
Access rights
Worldwide accessDate
2013-09-16Author
Wysocki, Joseph F.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This dissertation examines a previously unexamined factor that may contribute to
the recent decline in Congress, the historical development of congressional rhetoric.
Chapter one begins by examining the relationship between rhetoric and factors that lead
to institutional health in Congress. Primarily, it argues that certain uses of rhetoric
contribute to deliberation, regular order, and institutional identity, while others
undermine these institutional goals. Rhetoric that undermines these goals has been used
increasingly as congressional speeches have become more public in recent history. The
chapter then proposes five specific standards to trace the development of rhetoric in two
historical case studies. These standards are taken from scholarship on presidential
rhetoric. They include: 1) the connection between speech and thought, 2) the
constitutional tradition, 3) rhetorical self-restraint, 4) masculine and feminine rhetoric,
and 5) crisis rhetoric.
The first case study examines the two eras of congressional responses to the
President’s Annual or State of the Union Address. Chapter two examines the institutional
response prepared by both the House of Representatives and the Senate during the first
twelve years of the United States existence. Chapter three turns to the televised
opposition party responses offered by members of Congress that began in 1966. These
two chapters show the more extreme examples of rhetoric according to the above
standards. The second case study shows this transition more gradually. Chapters four
through eight examine the floor debates of five important congressional reforms. These
include: 1) the Pendleton Act, 2) the “revolt” against Speaker of the House Joseph
Cannon, 3) the 1946 Legislative Reorganization Act, 4) the 1961 changes to the Rules
Committee, and 5) the 1970 Legislative Reorganization Act. These chapters illustrate the
slow decline in rhetoric, according to the five standards developed. The conclusion in
chapter nine ties the two case studies together with congressional decline and proposes an
agenda for future research in the area of congressional rhetoric.