Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCorey, David D.
dc.contributor.authorAddison, Brandi
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-20T16:53:00Z
dc.date.available2015-05-20T16:53:00Z
dc.date.copyright2014-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/9263
dc.description.abstractThis thesis project uses the Just War Tradition to consider if the War on Terror qualifies as an ethical war. The question is difficult because the War on Terror differs so markedly from traditional wars that have been fought. Thus, I begin by establishing facts and background information about the war on terror. This reveals why its ethical dimension is difficult to analyze. I then turn to the just war tradition, examining some of the many different authors who have contributed to it, in order to see what different conditions authors have deemed necessary for a just war. I also consider the kinds of claims the tradition puts forward. Are the so-called “just war criteria” to be understood as legal claims, moral imperatives, ethical advice, or what? This turns out to be an important consideration, because it determines how the tradition should be applied to any particular case. Lastly, I analyze two specific claims of the just war tradition in reference to the War on Terror, whether or not there was a “legitimate authority” and the “likelihood of success.”en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsBaylor University projects are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact libraryquestions@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.titleThe War on Terror and the Question of Justiceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsWorldwide accessen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPolitical Science.en_US
dc.contributor.schoolsHonors College.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record