Flow, hypnotizability, absorption, and neuroticism in a college student population.

dc.contributor.advisorElkins, Gary Ray, 1952-
dc.creatorBowers, Juliette J., 1987-
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-01T15:09:34Z
dc.date.available2016-09-01T15:09:34Z
dc.date.created2016-08
dc.date.issued2016-07-11
dc.date.submittedAugust 2016
dc.date.updated2016-09-01T15:09:35Z
dc.description.abstractThe concept of “flow” refers to a state of attention and concentration in a current task. Benefits of entering a flow state may include the ability to optimize performance by reducing conscious cognitive processing (Nakamura & Csikszentmihalyi, 2002). For example, studies have found a state of flow is associated with improved athletic performance (Swann, Keegan, Piggot, & Crust, 2012). However, little is known about the relationship between other constructs and the impact they have on flow state. Dietrich (2004) has suggested that the ability to enter a flow state may relate to the same conscious state as hypnosis and absorption. Research also suggests a negative correlation between neuroticism and flow (Ullen et al., 2012). Further, Carlstedt (2004) posits a theory on optimal performance which suggests that high hypnotizability, high absorption ability, and low neuroticism may combine to improve the ability to enter a flow state. The present study addresses the relationship between flow and the constructs of hypnotizability, absorption, and neuroticism. One hundred and seventy undergraduate students completed measures of flow (CORE Flow Scale; CORE), hypnotizability (Elkins Hypnotizability Scale; EHS), absorption (Tellegen Absorption Scale; TAS), neuroticism (International Personality Item Pool- Neuroticism; IPIP-N), and dispositional flow (Dispositional Flow Scale-long version; DFS). Results indicated positive correlations between CORE and EHS as well as between DFS and IPIP-N. Multiple regression analysis confirmed a relationship between DFS, EHS, and CORE such that DFS has a moderating effect on the relationship between EHS and CORE. Results of this study advance knowledge of the gaps in components of flow and our understanding of the flow state experience by expanding on the relationship between flow state and hypnosis as well as neuroticism.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/9853
dc.language.isoen
dc.rights.accessrightsWorldwide access.
dc.rights.accessrightsAccess changed 10/26/18.
dc.subjectFlow. Hypnotizability.
dc.titleFlow, hypnotizability, absorption, and neuroticism in a college student population.
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
local.embargo.lift2018-08-01
local.embargo.terms2018-08-01
thesis.degree.departmentBaylor University. Dept. of Psychology & Neuroscience.
thesis.degree.grantorBaylor University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.namePsy.D.

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
BOWERS-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf
Size:
326.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Bowers signed copyright form.pdf
Size:
70.74 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
1.96 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: