Cooke, Matthew B.Nix, Carrie M.Baylor University. Dept. of Health, Human Performance and Recreation.2010-10-082010-10-082010-082010-10-08http://hdl.handle.net/2104/8047Includes bibliographical references (p. ).From the elite competitor, to the weekend athlete, or as a result of everyday activities, muscle injuries are a way of life. To date, no studies have examined the effectiveness of the Alter-G G-Trainer to enhance muscle recovery from injury. Twenty-five recreationally active males between 18 and 35 were randomly assigned to one of three recovery groups: G-Trainer, treadmill running, static stretching. Recovery was performed 30 minutes, 24, 48, and 72 hours following a 45 minute downhill run. Isokinetic strength, creatine kinase, superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde, muscle soreness and mood states were assessed at baseline, 15 minutes, 3, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours post-exercise. Significant time effects were observed for isokinetic knee flexion/extension at 60 and 180°/second, muscle soreness (p<0.05), muscle soreness (p<0.001) and POMS (p=0.013). A significant group by time interaction (p=0.027) was observed for POMS. The G-Trainer treadmill was unable to enhance muscle recovery following exercise-induced muscle damage.70163 bytes2301561 bytesapplication/pdfapplication/pdfen-USBaylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact librarywebmaster@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.Alter-G.Recovery.Exercise.G-trainer.Muscle damage.Isokinetic strength.Creatine kinase.Superoxide dismutase.Malondialdehyde.Muscle soreness.Profile of mood states.Comparison of post-exercise recovery strategies on physiological and biochemical markers of exercise-induced muscle damage.ThesisWorldwide access