Kongzi, Rawls, and the sense of justice in the Analects.

dc.contributor.advisorBaird, Robert M., 1937-
dc.contributor.authorCline, Erin May.
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophy.en
dc.contributor.otherBaylor University. Dept. of Philosophy.en
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-31T01:16:48Z
dc.date.available2006-07-31T01:16:48Z
dc.date.copyright2006-05
dc.date.issued2006-07-31T01:16:48Z
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 329-338).en
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is a comparative study of the philosophy of John Rawls and the Confucian Analects regarding the idea of a sense of justice. The first aim of this work is to correct a view that has been advanced by several scholars of Chinese and comparative philosophy, namely, that the absence of terms such as "justice" in classical Chinese indicates that classical Chinese texts are not concerned with questions of justice, and that classical Confucian philosophers were not interested in the ideas that are the focus of modern Western political philosophy. Against these claims, I argue that there are deep and important areas of agreement between the understanding of a sense of justice in the Analects and John Rawls's account of a sense of justice. I show that on both views, a sense of justice is cultivated first within the context of parent-child relationships and then within communities, finally emerging as a fully developed moral sense that informs the capacity to feel and act in certain ways toward other members of society. The second aim of this study is to show how comparative work can help us to understand more fully and accurately the features of two or more views. I argue that studying the idea of a sense of justice in the Analects alongside a Rawlsian sense of justice highlights some important dimensions of Rawls's work that have been neglected, including the role he assigns to the family and the community in his account of how citizens cultivate a sense of justice. I also argue that Rawls's discussions of moral psychology and the development of a sense of justice provide readers with a model for understanding the role that moral capacities can play in political philosophy. Rawls's account helps readers to see how an appreciation for justice can be expressed in a text like the Analects, even though there is not a fully developed theory of justice or a single term that consistently designates "justice."en
dc.description.degreePh.D.en
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Erin M. Cline.en
dc.format.extentx, 338 p.en
dc.format.extent2759989 bytes
dc.format.extent5507270 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2104/4212
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.rightsBaylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact librarywebmaster@baylor.edu for inquiries about permission.en
dc.rights.accessrightsWorldwide access.en
dc.rights.accessrightsAccess changed 3-16-09.
dc.subjectJustice (Philosophy).en
dc.subjectPhilosophy, Confucian.en
dc.subjectConfucianism and law.en
dc.subjectPolitical science -- philosophy.en
dc.subjectEthics, Comparative.en
dc.titleKongzi, Rawls, and the sense of justice in the Analects.en
dc.typeThesisen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
erin_cline_phd.pdf
Size:
2.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Dissertation
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
erin_cline_permissions.pdf
Size:
5.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Permissions Form

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.96 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: