From separationism to theocracy : how the domestic relationship between religion and state conditions the salience of religion in foreign policy.

dc.contributor.advisorWaltman, Jerold L., 1945-
dc.contributor.authorKent, Jennifer M.
dc.contributor.departmentChurch and State.en_US
dc.contributor.schoolsBaylor University. Institute of Church-State Studies.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study of international politics has undergone a profound re-consideration of disciplinary assumptions about religion since the end of the Cold War. From Samuel Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations to Peter Berger’s Desecularization of the World, scholars are attempting to identify and explain the re-emergence of religion globally and decipher its meaning and ramifications for the conduct of international politics. Unlike power and economics, which are constant pressures in the international system, religion is not present everywhere at all times but in some circumstances and often erratically. This dissertation asks how it becomes possible—under what situations or circumstances—for religion to be a salient feature of a nation’s foreign policy. It hypothesizes that the domestic religion-state relationship affects the salience of religion in a state’s foreign policies and the ways in which religion is salient in a state’s foreign policies. This dissertation takes a comparative approach, selecting three cases that differ in their domestic religion-state relationships: the United States, Russia and Iran. A historical account of the domestic religion-state relationship in each case is provided as well as the ways in which religion has functioned as a salient feature in each state’s foreign policies historically. The comparative analysis focuses on the two-decade period immediately following the collapse of the Soviet Union. The comparative analysis reveals that religion performs at least one function (legitimation, mobilization, or identity creation/delineation) at the foreign policy level in all three case studies. Religion is a more salient feature of Iranian foreign policy than of the foreign policies of either Russia or the United States. With some caveats, the ways in which religion functions in each state’s foreign policy is conditioned by the domestic religion-state relationship, such that American separationism limits the functionality of religion at the foreign policy level, the Russian symphonic relationship with religion at the domestic level enables a partnership model at the foreign policy level, and the Iranian theocratic model is consistent across the domestic policy-foreign policy divide.en_US
dc.rightsBaylor University theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. Contact for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsWorldwide access.en_US
dc.rights.accessrightsAccess changed 1/28/16.
dc.subjectForiegn policy.en_US
dc.subjectReligion and foreign policy.en_US
dc.subjectRussian foreign policy.en_US
dc.subjectIranian foreign policy.en_US
dc.subjectReligion and international relations.en_US
dc.subjectReligion and comparative politics.en_US
dc.subjectReligion and comparative foreign policy.en_US
dc.subjectComparative foreign policy.en_US
dc.subjectAmerican foreign policy.en_US
dc.subjectChurch-State relations.en_US
dc.titleFrom separationism to theocracy : how the domestic relationship between religion and state conditions the salience of religion in foreign policy.en_US


Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Kent dissertation Final beardocs.pdf
1 MB
Adobe Portable Document Format
No Thumbnail Available
64.92 KB
Adobe Portable Document Format
Copyright Form

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
1.87 KB
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission