Optimal Contract Under Asymmetric Information About Fairness

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPavlov, Valery
dc.contributor.authorKatok, Elena
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Wen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-09T19:44:54Z
dc.date.available2022-06-09T19:44:54Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-18
dc.description.abstractProblem definition: To improve the poor performance of supply chains caused by misaligned incentives under the wholesale price contract, theory proposes coordinating contracts. However, a common finding of experimental studies testing such contracts is that they tend to yield only a marginal, if any, performance improvement over wholesale pricing. These studies identify several behavioral factors that are at play but none accounted for by the theory proposing coordinating contracts. Among them, identified as the single most detrimental for the supply chain performance, is incomplete information about preferences for fairness causing contract rejections. Can the supply chain performance be improved with a contract designed allowing for this type of information asymmetry? What does this contract (mechanism) look like? Academic/practical relevance: The extant research characterized the optimal contracting mechanisms for such important practical cases as the suppliers’ private information about production cost or the retailers’ private information about the end customer demand. The present study addresses the gap in another important practical case: when the source of information asymmetry is the private information about preferences for fairness. Methodology: The underlying research method is mechanism design. Results: We prove that the optimal mechanism consists of a single contract positioned on the Pareto frontier and characterize the optimal profit split between the supplier and the retailer. We show that, under a wide range of preferences for fairness, the efficiency loss because of private information is strictly positive, but exceptions are possible. We also show that the optimal mechanism can be implemented with a variety of commonly used in practice and widely studied in academic literature contracts, including the minimum order quantity and the two-part tariff ones. Managerial implications: We establish a direct link between a large volume of theoretical and empirical literature on social preferences with the research on supply chain contracts. Because rejections that are because of incomplete information are an important cause of contract inefficiency observed in the laboratory, managers should avoid take it or leave it offers when they negotiate contracts. Instead, the bargaining process should be geared toward discovering the extent of the fairness preferences of the contracting parties.en_US
dc.description.keywordsbehavioral operationsen_US
dc.description.keywordsmechanism designen_US
dc.description.keywordsfairnessen_US
dc.description.keywordsoptimal contracten_US
dc.description.keywordsadverse selectionen_US
dc.description.keywordssupply chain coordinationen_US
dc.description.keywordsbargainingen_US
dc.identifier.citationPavlov, V., Kapok, E., & Zhang, W. (2021) Optimal Contract Under Asymmetric Information About Fairness. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 24(1), 1-689, C2. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0945en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1287/msom.2020.0945
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2104/12031
dc.publisherINFORMSen_US
dc.titleOptimal Contract Under Asymmetric Information About Fairnessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Fairness_-_optimality_of_pooling_contract_separate_formula_v2.pdf
Size:
1.06 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Faculty Scholarship